This executive order or 1ASA does not hold the best interest of the community concerning profanity.
Per Zoomer, and Nults,
As Nults said; Edit #2: Due to Mallace and Lith disregarding the community's opinions on this matter, I have no choice but to oppose this and oppose any similar requests in the future. Pushing rule changes on profanity through a system that doesn't require community input or even a staff majority is shady as hell and I refuse to support pushing requests like these through in a manner like this.
Links with profanity on Youtube have been abused in the past without any repression or care.
It is silly that not noticing a minor cuss in a Youtube comment warrants the same punishment one would receive for swearing at someone. - Mike Pence
Youtube comments are VERY unmoderated and break our ToU/Wiki policy. Â
When you link a Youtube video, you expose the user to the entire page. The comments CAN contain and are certainly not limited to; adult content, forms of cyber-bullying, offensive topics, insulting other users, spamming, excessive arguing and drama, potential personal information, links to inappropriate content, and references to offensive or inappropriate topics.
Youtube comments basically undermine every single rule we have in place to protect our users. To let this loophole slip by a 1ASA only displays our President's disregard for the thought of our users.
A simple warning (even if you are unaware of what is detailed in the comments) will void you of any punishment if a user finds the link offensive in any manner.
I believe a proper SSC is necessary but first I would like to see everyone's opinions on this matter regardless of their voting rights.