POTCO Players Wiki
Register
Line 447: Line 447:
 
==BITCH PLEASE==
 
==BITCH PLEASE==
   
  +
== FUCK YOU ALL ==
== Unban Request: Captain Matthew O'malley ==
 
 
Well, didn't think I would be the one to write this.... but this coming January, Matthew O'malley will have been banned for a year and three-fourths. Do you not think he's learned his lesson? He just wants to be back here, and he agrees to all of our rules. He served a fair punishment for what he did, and he should be able to return. His actions were long in the past, and we've all learned from it.
 
 
--<span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge maroon; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(maroon), to(gold)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, maroon, gold); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black">[[User talk:John Breasly|'''''<span style="font-family:verdana; color:maroon; text-shadow: gold 0 1px 1px;">John Breasly</span>''''']]'''''<span style="font-family:verdana; color:maroon; text-shadow: gold 0 1px 1px;">,</span>''''' [[Savvy Designs|'''''<span style="font-family:verdana; color:maroon; text-shadow: gold 0 1px 1px;">Savvy Designs Member</span>''''']]</span> 04:35, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
{{Support}} Though he may have done things, and though I may have been the one to bad him, I think he's ready to return. --[[w:Special:EmailUser/Batorhos|<font color=RoyalBlue>'''Batorhos'''</font>]] 04:45, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
{{Oppose}} He is a pedophile. Some of the things he has said on skype make me question whether or not he will one day contribute to a healthy society, and I fear that letting him back will possilby harm some of our younger members due to evidence of creepiness displayed on skype.
 
 
[[File:Mall_minecraft_sig.png|500px|link=user:Lord Andrew Mallace]] ''[[user talk:Lord Andrew Mallace|<span style="text-shadow: Purple 0 5px 4px;"><b><font face=Pristina size=5px color=Black>Talk</font></b></span>]]''
 
 
Thank you for your lovely opinions but this is an admin-only vote.
 
 
--<span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge maroon; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(maroon), to(gold)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, maroon, gold); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black">[[User talk:John Breasly|'''''<span style="font-family:verdana; color:maroon; text-shadow: gold 0 1px 1px;">John Breasly</span>''''']]'''''<span style="font-family:verdana; color:maroon; text-shadow: gold 0 1px 1px;">,</span>''''' [[Savvy Designs|'''''<span style="font-family:verdana; color:maroon; text-shadow: gold 0 1px 1px;">Savvy Designs Member</span>''''']]</span> 04:50, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
You are most welcome my holy sire. '''~This Unsigned Post was written by Lord Andrew Mallace'''
 
 
Hmm. We have currently been talking about this particular user's unban on the Admin Forums. I really don't see much of a reason not to unban him other than the fact that his actions were extremely severe. I have been talking to him in-game as well. For now I think I'll be {{Neutral}}. I want to hear some more opinions before I vote. If O'malley promises to behave well, I might be up that. Depends what the others say ;P [[File:GoldvaneSig.png|320px|link=User talk:Captaingoldvane2]] 14:25, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
I'd say {{support}} It has been long enough... Everyone should get another chance.[[File:Lord_Blake.png|400px|link=User:BlakeStewart]] [[File:UNKG0001.gif|140px]] 20:03, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 12:12, 30 September 2012

Archive5
Rules   Administrators   Rollbacks   Chat Moderators   Community Newsletter   Wiki Calendar   Featured Article   Development Suggestions  
Welcome, <insert name here>

Archives: 1234

Welcome to the Seven Seas Court![]

The Admins will review this page Daily for New Suggestions

What you can do here..[]

  • Suggest Block, Demotion, or Promotion requests.
  • Give feedback on the Wiki systems and provide suggestions.

How it works?[]

Users can suggest votes ( Other than rule requests ), updates, or ideas here, then rollbacks and admins will vote on it, if the vote is successful it will be put to a Community Vote.

Community Votes

Lord Andrew Mallace Lord Andrew Mallace 24 May 2020
11

Community Vote: The Future of the Wiki





Copied from the "Dissolution of the SSC and Granting of Eternal Presidency" thread here:

"Friends,

I …





Read Full Post
Squirto19 Squirto19 21 September 2018
12

Community Vote: Removal of the ISP



Copy pasted from this thread:

"This wiki has changed so much since its creation back in 2010, it's c…



Read Full Post
Squirto19 Squirto19 5 September 2018
11

Community Vote: Bureaucrat Demotions


For some time now, G-man has been allowed to hold Bureaucrat powers on two separate accounts since …


Read Full Post
Lord Andrew Mallace Lord Andrew Mallace 15 June 2018
12

Community Vote: Unban Request - Will Greasescarlett



As per our rules, Unban requests must be passed through a community vote. As much as I'd like to j…


Read Full Post

your gay[]

GAY BITCH


GAY

Inappropriate Talk.[]

your gay[]

your gay[]

YOUR GAY BITCH[]

NIGGUZ YALLL GAY[]

YALL GAY MFS[]

NIGGZ[]

Pearson Wright: Possible Unban Blog, Please Read.[]

Oppose
The Council has made a decision!

The Majority of the Court has voted Oppose!

Oppose

This is not meant to cause fights or drama. Thank you.


The past few days have been extremely argumentative, and violent. I haven’t seen this must drama since The Paradoxian Wars. I have seen over 8 videos on Youtube, all from different users, requesting the unban of Pearson Wright. He has been invited to Skype conversations by Sven Daggersteel, Jason, Hippie, Francis Chiphawk, Brooke Parker, Bella, William Yellowbones, Boogiemango, Skull Catcher, Firelegend, Sharkhound, and several other people all urging me to support to unbanning of Pearson Wright. Whether you administrators support it or not, the fact of the matter is, if you don’t adhere to the community, this wiki is going to start losing users, as well as contributions, decreasing activity, and ultimately, driving the site into inactivity, potentially destroying it. The majority of the community wants Pearson Wright unbanned. Due to his previous unban blog, you technically are obliged to unban him, but whatever. Let’s have a fresh start. He’s given me his word, and this isn’t some empty promise. I trust him. He’s never betrayed me before. I’ve known him a very long time. Curycoo would say the same, had Tama63 not demoted him. What I request, is that we the community be allowed to vote for the unbanning of Pearson Wright. If it does not pass, then okay. He'll understand.



I’m certain that you all know deep in your souls that Pearson Wright only had, three, REAL chances, almost 10x less than Samuel did. I remember once when he returned here, bandodging, and said, “I am sorry for what I have done.” Parax said. You expect him to change? He came to you, apologizing promising to change. You never ALLOWED that change to occur which is why this wiki is progressively declining. Look at the statistics. For the past YEAR, he has been banned. Look at the wiki. Look at how bad this situation has gotten. Clearly this isn’t working. Try something new. What could he possibly do now that he hasn’t already attempted in the past? He doesn’t even play the game anymore. You say this isn’t a social site, but the majority of the contributions made by administrators here are comments, I.E.: Social interactions. Don’t point out his flaws when you’ve still not corrected your own. Perhaps that’s why he keeps fighting with you. He tried changing for you, and you blew him off. You, brought this upon yourselves. This time, YOU will have to approach him, telling him that you will allow him to change, and that you will change as well. You’ll both start off on the right foot. Put your differences aside, and move on.



It is prohibited by The TOU to make a single rule, taking away a person’s right to be MENTIONED on a wiki. It is allowed here, on this wiki, to request the unbanning of users, and ALL users, so I therefore officially request the unban of the user Pearson Wright. Delete this, and you only prove that you truly are the bias, and unfair dictators that so many people have portrayed you as in their videos, blogs, comments, etc. Thank you for understanding.



Support Support - - Pearson Wright being unbanned:


  1. Jason Blademorgan
  2. BoogieMango
  3. First $ea Lord Sven Daggersteel
  4. Reyes De Luz (Albert Spark)
  5. Madster.
  6. Jim Logan
  7. Jason Shiprat
  8. Blake Stewart
  9. Basil Brawlmonk
  10. Duchess Natalie Andrea
  11. Dog Sharkidd (TheMaTr1x)
  12. Capt. Jack Darksilver
  13. David McMartin Son Of Sparrow


Oppose Oppose - Pearson Wright NOT being unbanned:

  1. JosephCoalSmythe
  2. Tyler Crossbones
  3. Lord Andrew Mallace
  4. Stpehen
  5. Parax
  6. Captaingoldvane2
  7. Grunt56
  8. John Breasly
  9. Katbluedog
  10. Tyler Crossbones
  11. YaxleyCola
  12. KittyNomsYou

Here are some of the many videos of the known users of POTCO, and The POTCO Players Wiki that request the unban of Pearson Wright!


BoogieWeirdSig


Oppose Oppose - while many say he has "changed", I don't think he has. If he has "changed" why would he continue making hate videos about this site? Stpehen Was HereHello


Let me just say this: If Samuel had 10x more chances, why does that make it ok for Pearson to have just as many?

Explain that logic, please. Because it makes no sense at all.

Click here for my talk page.

Click here for my userpage. 00:34, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Samuel's block is very different from Pearson's block, bringing Samuel into this is quite unnecessary since Pearson and Samuel reasons for being block were very quite different. 70px-Terror of the High Seas!Sharple Talk Page 00:51, September 25, 2012 (UTC)


That's not an excuse, try harder.


Click here for my talk page.

Click here for my userpage. 00:55, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry Nightmare but that wasn't an excuse I know for a fact that I am correct Samuel and Pearson's blocks are quite different. 70px-Terror of the High Seas!Sharple Talk Page 00:58, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Number one, this is not the place to fight. Number two, I WOULD Support Support - as long as he is told the simple reasons why he was banned, and told what he can do to fix it. Lord Blake UNKG0001 01:08, September 25, 2012 (UTC)


Support Support - First, before you go after me and say "Oh, you always want Pears unbanned" or try to bring up your side, know that I have my reasons to support. He definitely should've been unblocked after the vote in which support won. Though the admins tended to choose oppose on it, that didn't make it right for them to disregard it. A lot of the "drama" that's said to come from Pears is actually other people trying to unban him. Maybe it would end if it happened. It's been a long time since he's been on the wiki and there's a chance he's changed his attitude since then. Of course, when/if he's allowed back, he should be given the normal rights and restrictions and punished at the amount of time (if any) for any action (if any) he may have done; it's not like he'll get a special treatment, and I would hope he doesn't get different treatment from certain dislikes. If it becomes severe enough, go ahead and issue an inifinite ban again. If it's done rightfully then, there should really be no dispute.

Madster was here


I have seen his videos and listened to him harass people on the game. I don't see any proof of him "changing" God, people like him annoy the hell out of me. Constantly thinking he is better then everyone else? How could anyone want him back on the Wiki? In other words, I Oppose Oppose -

William (Grunt) Daggersteel Also Parax, I need to edit my signature. How can I do that?

Support Support - I believe Pearson deserves 1 more chance. He doesn't hate the wki he wants to make a statement. Just perm ban him from chat

- Prime Minister Basil Brawlmonk IV

Why do you say oppose has won? It clearly says support is thirteen, and oppose is twelve. I am sorry If I'm wrong, so if I am please correct me. But until then I believe support has one, and Pearson Wright is going to be unbanned. Jack Goldwrecker

Oppose won. Check the top of the page; it clearly says that only rollback and admin votes count. Non-admins/rollbacks can post their opinions and end up listed, but in the end, they won't count.--Parax 19:20, September 27, 2012 (UTC)















01:11, September 25, 2012 (UTC)














As I told Pearson, I said I wouldn't oppose his unbanning, however I never supported It. You have added my name illegally, Boogie, and I intend to take action against you. I now Oppose due to Boogie's completely immature and illegal allegations.

Mall minecraft sig Talk


Well, why not. We're all human, and I honestly wouldn't care less if he was back or not, as I see all this fighting would be solved if he's unbanned. Support Support -

SvenSignature

Honestly, I wish I could believe he changed. Really, I do. But I don't. I don't believe an ounce of it. We get told that he has "changed" and is a better person, yet he makes slander videos, attacks the wiki nonstop, generally obsessing over a website, an encyclopedic website about a pirate-themed game. For God's sake, if he is this pissed off about it, and if he really has sunken this low to the point of slandering the wiki and admins in videos, I just don't think he's as good as people claim him to be. Before anyone starts going, "Oh, you just hate him for what he did a year and a half ago" or "Stop holding grudges", I have forgiven him. I have, but that doesn't mean that I think his personality has changed. With the videos I see from him, and the fact that he shows a complete hatred for the wiki and its users makes me wonder why he wants to be on it so badly.
My point being, his behavior simply tells me he isn't a different person. Maybe some day, I'll be convinced, but with what I've seen, I just don't see a reason to let him on the wiki. Thus, I Oppose Oppose - the request. I might edit this to add some more points in some time, but for now I'll leave it at that.--Parax 01:23, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

I don't have much time tonight to type a long message, but I want to agree with everything Parax said. He just put my thoughts into words. Also, why is it your life goal for a banned user who was banned fairly ( Yes, at the time he broke rules, his action were worthy of a permanent block. ) unbanned on a site he hates? I mean, according to his friends,he doesn't even WANT back here, so why is it so important to call us dictators over not unabnning a user a year later after his ban? If he wants back, perhaps he can apologize for his actions and ask nicely? No, instead you try to make us look bad for banning a user for a right reason, aka doing our jobs. Oppose Oppose - GoldvaneSig 01:38, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

I was laughing as I read this. "Most of the community"? No. Most of us actually want him unbanned so he can get his sorry ass banned again. Most of his little community of jumpers that have edited here once want him unbanned. Not the whole wiki. Also I'm removing Mallace's name because of his request to have his name removed. The people you listed, save two, don't even edit here. This pitiful excuse of an unban blog is TERRIBLY written.

You compare his three chances to Samuel. I'm sorry, but Samuel's banned, it don't work like that. And Samuel didn't threaten to track someone's IP. And most of the edits aren't administrative, that's incorrect. Finally, I'd like to top it off with this - " Don’t point out his flaws when you’ve still not corrected your own." Well, unfortunately, dumbass, that works both ways. Correct your flaws before you point out ours. He has had his "chances" to change. He obviously haven't. His hate videos prove he hasn't. His verbal attacks prove he hasn't.

He's not being unbanned, give it up. Btw, if you didn't figure it out already. Oppose Oppose -

--John Breasly, Savvy Designs Member

I completely Support Support - the unbanning and return of Pears, most of you are letting your personal feelings nad propaganda get in the way of change. Let us bring back monseiur Pears, our distant brother from Espana.

Jason Shiprat CEO of Shiprat Industries

Oppose Oppose - 100%. Why would we let a user who hates this wiki come back? I don't think we should let someone who makes hate videos come back to this wiki. By the way, Samuel just broke the rules not cyberbullied users. Samuel is not the same as Pearson. --KatBlueDogHiya! 14:16, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

I believe he should come back, the fact that you hate him to the core is sick, alot of you anyways. Not going to say names but this is something we need to realize, if you really feel the need he'll do it again, then make a compromise, see if it comes out again such as, monitor him for a PERIOD of time, like a week NOT harassing him or anything and if its not what you expected and IS change as you never thought it would happen, Congratulations you WILL have peace, we're always fighting each other, thing is you guys dont want to be flexible, I realize he has done horrible things, but how about other who have had more chances? He has my support in coming back, and if you cant be flexible or compromise for peace, you are one mindless ass, I honestly hope others will support. Support Support - RSig3Norm(talk)1 23:55, September 25, 2012 (UTC)




Support Support - I think Pears deserves at least one more chance, I know he has made mistakes in the past, but everyone has. And the reasons we banned him were pretty biased compared to now-a-days. If he is unbanned, and he does cause trouble, let's not flip out and ban him right away(etc). Come on guys, we gave people dozens of chances and we gave Pears what 2, 3? So he makes a few hate videos, everyone does, now I am rambling, god dang it. POINT IS! Pears deserves another chance, for all we know, he can bring some livley hood to this place.

The Instant Classic 01:39, September 26, 2012 (UTC)


My mistake, Mallace. I was informed that you were a supporter. Please forgive my idiocy. :)

And, by the way, John, I'm sorry I don't live up to your expectations. I'm just have that type of dumbassery.

BoogieWeirdSig

I follow him on youtube and Facebook and stuff so don't go start saying I hold grudges. Oppose Oppose - Pearson doesn't even play POTCO anymore if I am correct. He threatened to track someone down using their IP. "The majority of the community wants Pearson Wright unbanned." What the hell? Not the majority, only the people who just follow Pearson around like his dogs.

Savvy Sig 1


Jim, Pearson didn't just make a FEW hate videos, his whole channel is practically devoted to hating on all of us! And, idk about you, but, I don't see hate videos coming from every single one of us.

I Oppose Oppose - this, because if this happens, then Pearson will just break some more rules, get banned, then the cycle begins again with someone making an unban vote, reason being "He's only had, like, 3 chances."

Plus, he doesn't even WANT to come back, why would he make all those hate videos if he wanted to come back?


Click here for my talk page.

Click here for my userpage. 14:57, September 26, 2012 (UTC)


After recent events, I have seen Pearson really starting to change and feeling sorry for alot of what he did, he is taking down those horrid hate videos forever and is promising change, I mean come on, it has been a year or so, he must have changed! We don't know until we try, and if you're not willing to try something then I don't know what to say to you. He is a great man outside Wiki and Role - Play, and is not the devil we make him out to be. Alot of the newer Role Players need to get to know their so called "enemy". If you have not personally met the guy and just start hating him based off what others say then it doesn't look good. I remember my brother Al, used to hate him because others did, but after a while he learned things and became curious, eventually he discovered Pearson is actually pretty cool to talk with other than Role - Play. I must Support Support -


NatalieHSigNatSeal 19:25, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

Just curious, how come you never disagree with your brother or anything?

Savvy Sig 1


There have been all sorts of cyber bullying on this site... like I said before in my comment on Breasly's blog. It is also true that Samuel had more chances than Pears, but still their bans are quite different. Look I've known Pears for a long time and I know that he changed. Look the hate videos to Breasly etc... Are only to protect Bella. And that what some people including Breasly saying that Bella's family didn't die is a form of cyber bullying (yes, it took place on the wiki i was there). I believe that Pears deserves one more chance. If you think he didn't changed just give him a chance to show you that your wrong.

-Dog Sharkidd (TheMaTr1x)

Now, as long as I've been here, I've only met Pears once. He wasn't hostile towards me in any way, we just talked and that was it. It was a short conversation on Chat. Everyone says he's a horrible person, but, other than his YouTube Videos, I really don't see any proof. I say that you guys give him a kind of, err, test run. Let him be unbanned for a week. If he acts up in the slightest, ban him.

DMSIG


@Dog, Couldn't have said it better.

@Parax.You’re saying that Pearson slanders the wiki? Might I remind you what slandering is? Slandering is a federal crime, where you intentionally run around talking crap about people when you know in fact what you’re saying is not true. Everything Pearson says in his videos is either true, or controversial; I’d say 95% of it is complete, fact. MANY people would agree with me. I think you have your terms mixed up. Seeing as you all are the ones that made the “hate mail” page about him, in which you depicted him as talking bad about the entire wiki, and everyone on it, when in reality, he never did that, and gained him a TON of enemies; that in itself is the definition of slandering. You’d not only be contradicting yourself, but also be a complete hypocrite to say other wise. Now, does Pearson insult you? Does he roast you, and make fun of you and call you a dictator? Yes. But guess what? He’s not the only one that does that. You’re not as NEAR as offended by it when some random noob does it. I’m certain by now that the reason you’re so hung over on keeping him banned is because not only does he insult, you, but when he insults you, he brings up facts from the past, which really get to you. Now, he has clearly proven his point and is the bigger person because he was sworn to ALL of us that he will remove every hate video he has, AND apologize for what he did. HOWEVER, he is expecting the same from you. You can keep this up, this absurd internet war, whereas you continue annoying him, and he continues dissing you on Youtube, or you can both just stop and he can delete his videos, and you can unban him and we can try and all get along. He’s been banned a year. I think it’s time he be let back. @Tyler, What's wrong with agreeing? Kat and Step are also in the same family and agree on alot of things, hell, they even work in the same field for a job, that is more than Natalie and I. Wish we were that close xD


RSig3Norm(talk)1 20:07, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

1.) Exactly. His hate videos ARE him talking crap about people. What he says is NOT true. It's all freaking exaggerated, him playing victim to give us a bad name because he can't get over his ban.
2.) Hi7878 forged the "hate mail", WE as a whole did not. Pearson was aware of this, and threatened to frame us with it if we didn't unban him.
3.) How the hell am I contradicting myself or being a hypocrite?
4.) Damn straight, he does. You should've seen those "Views on the POTCO Players Wiki" slander videos. In them, he attacked the admins with false facts, used profanity, and told us to rot in hell.
5.) Sure, I'm not offended if a noob does it. I'm not offended if Pearson does it either.
6.) No, I am not "hung over" keeping him banned for that. What he did during his "last chances" here were bad/screwed up enough to get him banned for life. Don't believe me? I'll show you the ban requests.
7.) He has proven no "point". He isn't "the bigger person". We're trying to work as a cooperative encyclopedic site, and Pearson is attacking us because he can't get over a ban that occurred a year and a half ago.
8.) We don't want this "absurd internet war". He got banned, and he won't get over it. If he and his followers stopped coming here to flame us, this conflict would've died down a LONG time ago.
9.) He isn't "dissing" anybody; he's making hate videos to give us a bad name because of his grudge on the internet.
10.) Yes, he's been banned for a year. What's your point? A permanent ban doesn't mean we're holding anything against him when we refuse to ban him a year and a half later. It means he screwed up big time on his "last chance" and did enough to get banned permanently.
Have I made my point now?

--Parax 21:34, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

Most of the reasons for Pears being let back utilize a "why not" mentality. Question: What good would it do for the wiki as a whole to let him back? The majority of what supporters have said is not fact, it is what Pearson SAID he would do: remove his hate videos and not cause drama. I agree with the fact that he has not received as many chances as others, but seeing as nobody else has done the same things as him, it's like comparing apples to oranges. That being said, I ask that if you reply to this, you do so without insulting me. I am willing to change my vote if logic and fact are presented, but for now I Oppose Oppose -. Cher Bear =D (talk) 23:24, September 26, 2012 (UTC)


Wow. I had come up with a long message but I lost it all with edit conflict. Thanks Step :/


Anyway, I'm going to leave these here, in hopes of convincing the Supporters to change their mind.


John_Breasly_is_my_hero!

John Breasly is my hero!







THIS_is_why_I_hate_The_POTCO_Players_Wiki

THIS is why I hate The POTCO Players Wiki






Jack_Goldwrecker_-_POTCO_Religious_Fanatic

Jack Goldwrecker - POTCO Religious Fanatic







Pearson HATES us, doesn't even want to come back, and if he does come back, he'll act the same way he did with his OTHER chances.


Click here for my talk page.

Click here for my userpage. 00:18, September 27, 2012 (UTC)


September 27, 2012 (UTC) '1.) He’s talking crap about you, because you all were the first to insult him. When he first came to this wiki, do you know what his warm welcome was? “GET THE HELL OFF OF OUR WEBSITE TROLL”, and a funeral blog, telling him to burn in Hell. He isn’t even requesting to be unbanned. WE, the community, the people that make up THIS wiki are DEMANDING that he be let back. Do you know why? You’re boring us to death. This wiki is so bias, and cruel, it’s just ridiculous. It’s one-sided. There used to be so many pages, and now it’s just England, because you banned all The Spaniards, literally, right after you banned Pearson.

2.) Hi7878 did not make the hatemail. Jim Logan did. Stop casting blame on random users because in fact you never truly gave any proof that Hi7878 did it, and to my knowledge, him and Pearson are pretty good friends, so I doubt he’d do that. Pearson did not threaten to frame you. He threatened to destroy the wiki if the page was not removed. It took you heartless monsters 2 days to remove that page. You left it up there, knowing that it was a slander page. You just wanted Pearson to acquire enemies. I’m not an idiot, and neither is he. Clearly that’s why you infuriated half the game.


3.) How are you contradicting your self? You have the temerity to say that Pearson is slandering you, when, whenever I come on this wiki, or go into the chat, and ask about Pearson, I get the same bias, one-sided bull crap. “He cyber-bullied.” Pearson Wright has NEVER driven anyone to suicide. This wiki, has put 3 people on the edge of it, THEREFORE, you are a hypocrite. Do you understand now? Can you process that Parax?


4.) How are his views on The POTCO Players Wiki slander videos? They’re his views. Lol? Slandering is stating things that are false, and making them out to be facts. All he did was give his opinion; idiot. He attacked you with “false facts”? LOL, good choice of words there, Oh mighty one. He told you to rot in hell? Aww, that hurt your feelings? ☹ Funny, because didn’t you practically do the same thing, ALL of you? And then you called him a baby for making such a big deal out of it. Once again, PARAX, that is how you are a hypocrite. Do you understand now?


5.) I beg to differ, because if you weren’t offended by it, you wouldn’t be fighting so hard to keep him off this wiki, and don’t say you’re doing it for the “community” when over half the community wants him back.


6.) What exactly did he do, that was THAT bad? PLEASE, explain it to me. You have a rule here prohibiting banning users based on things that occur off this site. You don’t break rules? Ever? You just broke one. The worst thing Pearson has done is threaten to kill Sharple in which he was only joking. After John Breasly infinitely banned him, Sharple even SAID, “Wow John, that’s a bit excessive, he was only joking.”


7.) Pearson isn’t attacking you. Stop being such a baby. You CHOOSE to go watch his videos, they aren’t posted here. If you’re so offended by them, why do you keep watching them. He clearly states in all his videos, “If you don’t like what I’m saying, there’s a simple solution, don’t watch my videos.”


8.) He’s been over it. Once again, HE is not requesting to be unbanned. You are somehow consoled by the fact that Pearson wants to come back. He doesn’t give a crap. We’re just bored. Pearson’s cool. He’s smart. He’s attractive. He’s something that this wiki NEEDS. He’s an entertainer.


9.) You already have a bad name. Lol. He’s just making videos because he’s tired of his baby girl being insulted. You people slander him on this wiki, and prevent anyone from speaking out against it, which is why he goes to other sites, and replies to it. You then CHOOSE to go view his replies, then complain about how he’s slandering you. What a SCREWED up mindset; Jesus Christ.


10.) Almost everyone on this wiki agrees, even many of the people that oppose his unbanning, that what he did, did NOT deserve an infinite ban. You, yourself, yes, Parax, You, have done worse than he has on THIS wiki; FAR worse. Pearson never meant to hurt, ANYONE. He wanted to be the clown of the wiki, because he’s hilarious. You all used that against him, and tried to play it off as if he was “cyber-bullying” you. Seriously? Grow up. Grow some balls. Stop being so incoherent, seriously.

~unsigned posy


Hmm. So, after spending however long he did to write that, he's still not going to be unbanned. LOL. The Seven Seas Court is for admins to vote on, not users. So all those users' votes go nowhere. Admins said no, it doesn't happen. If you want to prove you're not obsessed with this website, stop obsessing over it. You're acting like a child who can't get a toy. It doesn't matter how "unfair," or "mean," your ban was, the fact is you were threatening someone, and that got you banned. Maybe if you thought about what you said for once instead of tramping around like an incoherent twat all day on YouTube, you'd be a bit farther in life.

--John Breasly, Savvy Designs Member 00:51, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Agree with John. As for Jason's post: Th facepalm Again, whoever wrote those 10 points completely misses the whole thing. As usual, everything is twisted around to make Pearson look like the victim. Of course, I see no point in arguing with people this childish, as anyone who actually believes those "10 points" Jason posted obviously won't be capable of thinking up to this level, and realize that Pearson is not the victim. So, rather than waste my breath (or… whatever you can think of related to fingers…), I'll just choose to ignore those childish attempts to counter my argument and let this vote continue. After all, only rollbacks and admins count in SSC votes. Take care now, bye-bye then. :)--Parax 02:02, September 27, 2012 (UTC)


SUCCESS!

-stands up in court and begins applauding, also thinking about the money I earned for winning the case-


Click here for my talk page.

Click here for my userpage. 02:05, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose
The Council has made a decision!

The Majority of the Court has voted Oppose!

Oppose



No more comments on this subject.


Jack, it's an admin-only vote, everyone else just felt compelled to pretend their votes counted in it.

--John Breasly, Savvy Designs Member 19:20, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

NIGGUH[]

FUCK YALL[]

GAYZ[]

SUCK MEH DICK[]

BITCH PLEASE[]

FUCK YOU ALL[]